Vote Requested: RP Hoarding Tax
Moderator: pacers
-
mantypas/CavsCzar
- General Manager
- Posts: 2749
- Joined: December 20th, 2023, 12:06 pm
Vote Requested: RP Hoarding Tax
I voted yes simply because I would benefit from it. is that bad?
FOR THE LAND - believe!
-
SourKittles
- General Manager
- Posts: 324
- Joined: May 4th, 2025, 8:02 pm
Vote Requested: RP Hoarding Tax
I voted no for now, but if there's ...
1. Increase of the trade cap! (To Hoff's point - this is an important one IMO and would make the trade market more dynamic)
2. Moderate increase of the threshold (To R B's point)
3. A few-year delay in implementation (which seems like the plan anyway)
... then I'd definitely reconsider.
Not huge on the rolling average, though I respect that point. It feels like what the "challenge system" will look like in MLB: instead of fully solving the problem you might incidentally create a sub-strategy that people could exploit. I'd prefer a threshold where everyone is comfortable instead.
1. Increase of the trade cap! (To Hoff's point - this is an important one IMO and would make the trade market more dynamic)
2. Moderate increase of the threshold (To R B's point)
3. A few-year delay in implementation (which seems like the plan anyway)
... then I'd definitely reconsider.
Not huge on the rolling average, though I respect that point. It feels like what the "challenge system" will look like in MLB: instead of fully solving the problem you might incidentally create a sub-strategy that people could exploit. I'd prefer a threshold where everyone is comfortable instead.
-
- Newest Posts
- Top Active Users
- Newest Users
