Making SLN Great Again - Ideas for Improvement
Posted: November 14th, 2024, 3:45 pm
Will try to make my opinions short and sweet, reminder that they are just my opinions (not trying to tell anyone what to think):
Problem 1 – Shitting on GMs, trades, other team’s players publicly on the boards, etc.
My personal opinion is that this is not a problem right now. Maybe it's because of the toxicity we've seen in past leagues, but man could it be soooo much worse than it is right now lol. I think the closest we've gotten to "disrespectful" or "hurtful" is people being (genuinely) confused about deals and posting some comment like "why would X do this" or something. I too have felt the pit in the stomach feeling of making a bad deal - but imo that's just part of this game, and censoring all reactions to only include positive ones would create a synthetic / fake feeling to the league that would make me much less excited to log on - not because I like reading people getting shit on, but because I like interacting with everyone on the boards and wouldn't want to interact with some PG-rated version of people's thoughts. And I say this as someone who has basically lost every deal I've done in the last 6 seasons (TP deal, trading picks for Tobias and then sucking and having to trade more picks to get those picks back, trading my future for Klay and still sucking, etc.)
More importantly, though, I'd challenge anyone to find downright disrespectful posts - I think they're much more sparse than this article would make it seem.
Problem 2 – Cliques and not really knowing other GMs
All for a meetup / retreat. Not personally that into anything short of meeting up in person (zooms, questionnaires, etc. all more trouble than they're worth imo)
Problem 3 – Active Traders hitting folks up non-stop via text
This seems like a GM-by-GM issue and agree with what most folks have said in response to this - I personally can't believe how often I get ghosted / not responded to and think that is a WAY bigger issue for the league. It's so easy to just say "no thanks" or "let me think about it" or literally anything. I think being a part of this league means making a commitment to being responsive to trade offers - if you don't want to be hit up via phone, that's a personal preference that we can respect, but I think far too many GMs resort to non-responsiveness which is pretty shitty imo.
Problem 4 – Public Complaining on the Boards
Same reaction to Problem 1 - I don't think this is a problem. This doesn't really cause me any headache or heartache whatsoever, and I'd rather not censor or filter people's reactions - we're all human, and if Joe wants to complain about Covid injuries in the playoffs while his team has the single luckiest resignings period of all time, he should be able to do that and I should be able to rip him for it.
Problem 5 – the GMOTY award
Agree that this award is fucked - an article idea I had but never followed through on was looking through everyone's voting history to see 1. how often they vote for GMs in their "clique" and 2. how their rationale changes year to year to fit their voting agenda. But, I don't really see how an ESPYs style award article fixes the problem - either awards are decided on by the author unilaterally or they're voted on and we have the same issue of voting agendas.
Problem 1 – Shitting on GMs, trades, other team’s players publicly on the boards, etc.
My personal opinion is that this is not a problem right now. Maybe it's because of the toxicity we've seen in past leagues, but man could it be soooo much worse than it is right now lol. I think the closest we've gotten to "disrespectful" or "hurtful" is people being (genuinely) confused about deals and posting some comment like "why would X do this" or something. I too have felt the pit in the stomach feeling of making a bad deal - but imo that's just part of this game, and censoring all reactions to only include positive ones would create a synthetic / fake feeling to the league that would make me much less excited to log on - not because I like reading people getting shit on, but because I like interacting with everyone on the boards and wouldn't want to interact with some PG-rated version of people's thoughts. And I say this as someone who has basically lost every deal I've done in the last 6 seasons (TP deal, trading picks for Tobias and then sucking and having to trade more picks to get those picks back, trading my future for Klay and still sucking, etc.)
More importantly, though, I'd challenge anyone to find downright disrespectful posts - I think they're much more sparse than this article would make it seem.
Problem 2 – Cliques and not really knowing other GMs
All for a meetup / retreat. Not personally that into anything short of meeting up in person (zooms, questionnaires, etc. all more trouble than they're worth imo)
Problem 3 – Active Traders hitting folks up non-stop via text
This seems like a GM-by-GM issue and agree with what most folks have said in response to this - I personally can't believe how often I get ghosted / not responded to and think that is a WAY bigger issue for the league. It's so easy to just say "no thanks" or "let me think about it" or literally anything. I think being a part of this league means making a commitment to being responsive to trade offers - if you don't want to be hit up via phone, that's a personal preference that we can respect, but I think far too many GMs resort to non-responsiveness which is pretty shitty imo.
Problem 4 – Public Complaining on the Boards
Same reaction to Problem 1 - I don't think this is a problem. This doesn't really cause me any headache or heartache whatsoever, and I'd rather not censor or filter people's reactions - we're all human, and if Joe wants to complain about Covid injuries in the playoffs while his team has the single luckiest resignings period of all time, he should be able to do that and I should be able to rip him for it.
Problem 5 – the GMOTY award
Agree that this award is fucked - an article idea I had but never followed through on was looking through everyone's voting history to see 1. how often they vote for GMs in their "clique" and 2. how their rationale changes year to year to fit their voting agenda. But, I don't really see how an ESPYs style award article fixes the problem - either awards are decided on by the author unilaterally or they're voted on and we have the same issue of voting agendas.